The NAR Lawsuit: Did Realtors Conspire to Inflate Your Home Buying Costs?

Buying a house is a major life decision, and the associated costs, including realtor commissions, can be significant. Recently, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and several major real estate brokerages faced legal challenges alleging they conspired to artificially inflate these commissions. Let's delve into the lawsuit and understand its potential implications.

‍

The Accusation:

The lawsuit, Sitzer v. National Association of Realtors, alleged that the NAR, along with companies like Keller Williams Realty and Realogy, violated antitrust laws by enforcing a rule that requires sellers to pay the buyer's agent commission. This rule, known as the buyer-broker compensation rule, essentially compels sellers to pay both their own agent and the buyer's agent, regardless of who brings the buyer to the table.

‍

The Argument:

The plaintiffs argued that this rule creates an anti-competitive environment that artificially drives up home prices. They claimed that realtors benefit financially from this rule, as commissions are typically a percentage of the final sale price. By inflating home prices, the lawsuit argued, the NAR and brokerages were increasing their own profits at the expense of home buyers and sellers.

‍

The Verdict:

In October 2023, a jury in Missouri ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, finding the NAR and several other defendants liable for damages. The initial award was $1.8 billion, with the potential to grow to over $5 billion depending on further legal proceedings.

‍

What Now?

The NAR has appealed the verdict, arguing that the buyer-broker compensation rule is a matter of professional practice and not subject to antitrust laws. While the legal process continues, the verdict raises several questions about the future of realtor commissions and their impact on the housing market.

However, there are now nearly two dozen copycat lawsuits popping up across the country, indicating that this problem is not going to disappear for the NAR, and has both brokerages and agents panicking.

‍

Potential Implications:

• Reduced Commissions: If the verdict and its potential increase hold, it could lead to lower realtor commissions for both buyers and sellers, ultimately impacting the industry.
• Shifting of Costs: With potentially lower commissions, there could be a shift in how realtors are compensated, possibly leading to hourly fees or flat rate structures.
• Increased Competition: Increased scrutiny of the industry may lead to greater competition among realtors, potentially benefiting consumers with more choices and potentially lower costs.

‍

It's important to note that the legal process is ongoing, and the ultimate outcome and its implications for the housing market remain to be seen. This blog post serves as an overview of the lawsuit and its potential impact, not financial or legal advice. It's crucial to stay informed as the situation unfolds and consult with qualified professionals when making real estate decisions.

‍